Notice her last statement: 'Something happened... something that CREATED a hot space from which the universe expanded.' This is something that evolution leaves out; the link between nothing and something.
August 12, 2009 <- the anonymous that posted ..well the top one..You really didn't hear what she said dude. Sorry. "Something created"..but it wasn't from nothing. She speculated about what could exist before.
Hmm, no need for god to step in just because we simply don't (and maybe will never ever) understand the mechanisms of the universes (re)birth. At the moment there is a popular theory that our cosmos exists inside a (mem)brane that periodically bumps into others in a higher dimensional space and that this is the cause for the big bang. But even if this turns out wrong and we're just a part of a gigantic Android application, it doesn't bring god into the game.
Why comes, that in science every time there is something we can't understand god comes into play and all critics scream: 'See, that's a evidence for the existence of god?'
Don't get me wrong: i respect all those who believe in a higher existence and build up their strength and hope out of it, but even if i don't do i don't turn around everytime i find something that religion can't explain to me and yell out: 'See, there can't be a god!' I can't do so because i don't know and i respect another persons view.
4 comment(s):
Notice her last statement: 'Something happened... something that CREATED a hot space from which the universe expanded.' This is something that evolution leaves out; the link between nothing and something.
SOMETHING cannot be "created" out of NOTHING. And if some invisible flying "god" "created" everything, then where'd this entity come from?
Personally, I don't care, because it's not important. But the whole "creation v. evolution" thing is getting rather tiresome.
August 12, 2009 <- the anonymous that posted ..well the top one..You really didn't hear what she said dude. Sorry. "Something created"..but it wasn't from nothing. She speculated about what could exist before.
Hmm, no need for god to step in just because we simply don't (and maybe will never ever) understand the mechanisms of the universes (re)birth. At the moment there is a popular theory that our cosmos exists inside a (mem)brane that periodically bumps into others in a higher dimensional space and that this is the cause for the big bang. But even if this turns out wrong and we're just a part of a gigantic Android application, it doesn't bring god into the game.
Why comes, that in science every time there is something we can't understand god comes into play and all critics scream: 'See, that's a evidence for the existence of god?'
Don't get me wrong: i respect all those who believe in a higher existence and build up their strength and hope out of it, but even if i don't do i don't turn around everytime i find something that religion can't explain to me and yell out: 'See, there can't be a god!' I can't do so because i don't know and i respect another persons view.
my2cents
Post a Comment